Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (2024)

Aaron Bonnette

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (1)

Clinical Psychology is the focus of my research. Specifically, I am interested in substance use and psychopathology. Currently, I am investigating the relationship of minority stress to mental health and substance use in sexual minorities. In the future, I plan to pursue a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology.

Supervisor: Dr. Schepis

Erin Cowart

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (2)

I am interested in social psychology, and how our self-concepts and emotional biases relate to our social world. More specifically, my research interests focus on the interplay between moral judgments, emotions, and social situations. Understanding how these factors influence each other could offer insight to those with extremist views, and the subsequent social, and often violent, divide between various groups. Through my own research, I hope to foster better understanding and compassion towards people who hold seemingly immoral views as compared to our own.

Supervisor: Dr. Mendez

Callie De La Cerda

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (3)

Broadly, I am interested in developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. My research interests include ingroup and outgroup bias, inhibitory control, theory of mind and deception. My thesis intends to examine the relationship between these cognitive and social components and how they relate to early childhood deception. After earning my master’s degree, my plans include pursuing a Ph.D. to help further my research and data analysis skills with the eventual goal of becoming a professor and researcher at a university.

Supervisor: Dr. Warnell

Rachel Farley

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (4)

My research interests include post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive psychology, and forensic psychology. My thesis will focus on the relationship between childhood trauma and cognitive functioning in adults, specifically focusing on how this trauma affects learning and memory. In the future, I plan to pursue a PhD in either Clinical Psychology or Counseling Psychology. My career goals are to treat victims of domestic violence and sexual violence in a clinical setting to help them work towards rehabilitation and recovery.

Supervisor: Dr. Etherton

Madeline Giblin

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (5)

My research interests are in the areas of personality and health psychology, specifically related to the impact of and relationship between various facets of an individual’s personality and the healing processes that take place following injury or disease. My thesis will focus on the specific nature of this relationship as it relates to chronic pain patients and the personality characteristics that influence an individual’s propensity for opioid misuse or abuse during and following treatment. Following the completion of my master’s degree in psychological research, I plan to pursue a doctoral degree in clinical psychology.

Supervisor: Dr. Howard

Niki Hayatbini

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (6)

My research interests are body image distortions and cognitive distortions in individuals with body dysmorphic disorders and people who undergo cosmetic surgeries. Since the number of cosmetic surgeries is increasing, examining the underlying mechanisms of body image disorders is becoming more of a pressing concern, especially because body image dissatisfaction can affect one’s function and quality of life. I’m also interested in how body image cognitive distortions result in negative emotions and the use of dysfunctional coping strategies such as avoidance or getting cosmetic surgery. Another area of my research interests involves psychological and bio-behavioral mechanisms that influence the development, expression, and amelioration of maladaptative behaviors especially in anxiety and mood disorders.

Supervisor: Dr. Abramovitch

Jennifer Hopper

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (7)

My research interests primarily focus on cross-cultural, health, social, and developmental psychology. Particular interests include autism spectrum disorders, attachment styles, stress, diet, sociocultural factors that influence health and body image, and testing of alternative health practices with evidence-based medicine procedures.

Supervisor: Dr. Howard

Shelby Lipschuetz

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (8)

Currently, I have many research interests in the field of Health Psychology including exercise, stress, ADHD and orthorexia. For my thesis research, I hope to explore these topics, specifically orthorexia and how it manifests in variables such as relationship satisfaction, supplement use, and self-control. Doing this will provide more information on personality traits associated with orthorexia, allowing for a refined diagnosis that can be included in the DSM-V.

Supervisor: Dr. Oberle

Anthony Lopez

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (9)

My research interests fall into the realm of social psychology, cross-cultural psychology, and growth mindsets in students. More specifically, I plan to explore how students from a collectivist cultural background differ from those with an individualistic background when it comes to attributions of failure and how these attributions interplay with one another to affect an individual’s stress, anxiety and fatigue levels. Through this research I hope to be able to lay the groundwork for a behavior intervention model that may target factors that directly influence a student’s academic success.

Supervisor: Dr. Mendez

Anthony Robinson

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (10)

My research interests lie primarily within the fields of clinical neuropsychology and cognitive psychology. My current research focuses on the neurocognitive correlates of perfectionism. My other research interests include examining the relationship between cognitive factors and Bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, MDD, and Anxiety disorders. I am also interested in the development and validation of self-report psychological measures.

​​​​​​​Supervisor: Dr. Abramovitch

Morgan Snyder

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (11)

My interests are within the area of health psychology. I am interested in health behavior change, adherence, and physician-patient communication. In my thesis, I plan to examine the relationship between physician word use and outcomes such as patient satisfaction and adherence. In the future, I want to look at how weight stigma or weight loss counseling could influence the physician-patient relationship.

Supervisor: Dr. Haskard-Zolnierek

Nicole Stokes

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (12)

My research topic involves figuring out how to help others deal with suicide ideation and emotional issues such as perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. This concept stems from the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide (IPTS), but I am interested to see if there are preventive measures that keep people from having suicidal thoughts. I want to determine if there are ways to help cope with issues before the ideation by having helpful social support, avoiding aspects of self-blaming, and engaging in enjoyable hobbies or activities.

Supervisor: Dr. Hu

Cohort 2017 Individual Profiles (2024)


How many people should be in a cohort study? ›

A cohort is defined as a group of persons, usually 100 or more in size, who share a common characteristic, e.g. smokers, workers in a lead smelter, people born in the same year, or all enrollees of a specific health insurance plan Cohort studies compare an exposed group of individuals to an unexposed (or less exposed) ...

What is the most important information from a cohort study? ›

Follow-up of the study participants is very important in a cohort study, and losses are an important source of bias in these types of studies. These studies are used to estimate the cumulative incidence and incidence rate. One of the main strengths of a cohort study is the longitudinal nature of the data.

What are 4 strengths associated with cohort studies? ›

Strengths and weaknesses of cohort studies

Exposure is measured before the onset of disease (in prospective cohort studies). Good for measuring rare exposures, for example among different occupations. Demonstrate direction of causality. Can measure incidence and prevalence.

How to evaluate a cohort study? ›

The selection and representativeness of the study population must be examined to ensure generalisability. Next, it is essential to assess the measurement and classification of exposure and outcomes, considering the reliability, validity, and potential bias in their assessment.

How do you calculate sample size for a cohort study? ›

The estimated sample size n is calculated as: - where α = alpha, β = 1 - power, nc is the continuity corrected sample size and zp is the standard normal deviate for probability p. n is rounded up to the closest integer.

Do cohort studies need a large sample size? ›

Because the rate of outcome is usually smaller than the prevalence of the exposure, cohort studies typically require larger sample sizes to have the same power as a case-control study.

What is a major problem with cohort studies? ›

Cohort studies are at serious risk of confounding bias and so adjusting or accounting for confounding factors is a priority in these studies. Confounding occurs when the exposure of interest is associated with another factor that also influences the outcome of interest.

What are the disadvantages of a cohort study? ›

However, prospective cohort studies do come with drawbacks:
  • Time-consuming: These studies often take years, if not decades, to complete.
  • Resource-intensive: The long duration and extensive data collection requirements make prospective studies costly.

What is an important weakness of the cohort study? ›

Disadvantages of Prospective Cohort Studies

They can be very expensive and time consuming. They are not good for rare diseases. They are not good for diseases with a long latency. Differential loss to follow up can introduce bias.

What must all participants in a cohort study be? ›

Expert-Verified Answer. At enrollment, ALL participants in a Cohort Study must be: At risk for both exposure and outcome. In a cohort study, participants are enrolled based on their exposure status, meaning they are selected as either exposed or unexposed to a specific factor of interest.

Is a cohort study qualitative or quantitative? ›

Cohort studies are a type of observational study that can be qualitative or quantitative in nature. They can be used to conduct both exploratory research and explanatory research depending on the research topic.

What are the disadvantages of cohort based learning? ›

Disadvantages of Cohort-Based Learning
  • Cohort-based learning does not afford the flexibility options that some learners might desperately need.
  • As in a classroom setting, group learning often creates a selection bias due to different skill levels and comprehension rates.
  • Cohort-based learning is expensive.
Mar 22, 2024

What makes a good cohort study? ›

The hallmark of a cohort study is defining the selected group of subjects by exposure status at the start of the investigation. A critical characteristic of subject selection is to have both the exposed and unexposed groups be selected from the same source population (Figure 4).

What makes a cohort study valid? ›

Cohort studies are an appropriate study design when: (1) there is good evidence to suggest an association between an exposure and an outcome (perhaps through prior cross-sectional studies); (2) the interval between exposure and development of the outcome is relatively short to minimize loss to follow-up; and (3) the ...

What is the conclusion of cohort analysis? ›

In conclusion, cohort analysis is a valuable tool for businesses to identify their most profitable customers and optimize their marketing and sales efforts.

What is a good cohort rate? ›

A higher rate typically means that customers are satisfied with your business. This is also a good indicator of high customer loyalty. Ideally, you would want your cohort retention rate to be at 100%.

What is the requirement for cohort study? ›

The participants must be identical, having common characteristics except for their exposure status. The participants are divided into two groups – the first group is the 'exposure' group, the second group is free of the exposure.

Can a cohort study only have one group? ›

There is often confusion in designating studies as “cohort studies” when only one group of subjects is examined. Yet, unless a second comparative group serving as a control is present, these studies are defined as case-series.

What is the odds ratio in a cohort study? ›

Odds ratios are often calculated from the so-called cross product of cells from a 2x2 table where cell “a” is the number of exposed cases, cell “b” is the number of unexposed cases, “c” is the number of exposed controls and “d” is the number of unexposed controls: odds ratio = (ad) / (bc)

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gregorio Kreiger

Last Updated:

Views: 6099

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gregorio Kreiger

Birthday: 1994-12-18

Address: 89212 Tracey Ramp, Sunside, MT 08453-0951

Phone: +9014805370218

Job: Customer Designer

Hobby: Mountain biking, Orienteering, Hiking, Sewing, Backpacking, Mushroom hunting, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Gregorio Kreiger, I am a tender, brainy, enthusiastic, combative, agreeable, gentle, gentle person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.